Dynamical Neuroscience: A Viewpoint

[Back]


Neuroscience, the study of the brain and nervous system, is one of the most rapidly developing and exciting fields in all of modern science today (see reviews by Albright et al., Neuron, 25:S1-S55, 2000 and Kandel and Squire, Science, 290:1113-1120, 2000).  This likely stems from its highly interdisciplinary nature together with its effect on each and every one of us in terms of understanding how we think, feel, grow, remember and interact with our environment. Moreover, an understanding of our most complex organ, the brain, is required if we are to be able to prevent and relieve pathological conditions such as epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, depression and other mental disorders.

The long-term goal of the lab is to forge links between the dynamics that exist at the different levels of the brain and nervous system (molecular/cellular/multi-cellular/network).  In particular, to obtain biophysically-based mechanisms underlying network dynamics.  A fundamental aim in the computational neuroscience field is to understand how the rich interplay of highly nonlinear, intrinsic properties of individual neurons together with their coupling properties give rise to the several dynamical activities of neuronal networks.  Mathematical modelling is uniquely poised to make such a linkage and provide functional insights. However, it is far from clear what level of model detail is needed to generate new insights. We should neither ignore the details of particular systems nor be overwhelmed by them. The balance is the challenge in advancing our understanding.  We work towards our goal by: (i) establishing intimate links with experimental studies to allow mathematical models to be developed and to determine where modeling studies are warranted, and (ii) simulating and analyzing developed mathematical models to enable insights and predictions to emerge.

The present focus is on modelling inhibitory, GABAergic hippocampal interneurons and networks, in the context of coherent rhythmic output, and with consideration of their diverse, heterogeneous natures. The effects of anesthetics, the effect of gap-junctional and inhibitory coupling characteristics, and the contribution of synaptic plasticity in the form of depression are of interest.  Present and past collaborators and labs include: Dr. Liang Zhang, Dr. Sue Ann Campbell, Dr. Chris McBain, Dr. Jean-Claude Lacaille, Dr. Beverley Orser, Dr. Peter Pennefather and Dr. Peter Carlen.